| Title |
Why We Shouldn't Turn Our Backs on Financial Globalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMF Economic Review, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1057/imfsp.2008.30 |
| Authors |
Frederic S Mishkin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#278
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,667
of 183,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.