↓ Skip to main content

Incentive Contracts for Infrastructure, Litigation and Weak Institutions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Regulatory Economics, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Incentive Contracts for Infrastructure, Litigation and Weak Institutions
Published in
Journal of Regulatory Economics, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11149-004-4416-y
Authors

Alfredo Garcia, James D. Reitzes, Juan Benavides

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 28%
Engineering 6 24%
Social Sciences 5 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2006.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Regulatory Economics
#72
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,211
of 140,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Regulatory Economics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them