↓ Skip to main content

Charting a Seven-Year Trajectory of Language Outcomes for a Child with Galactosemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Charting a Seven-Year Trajectory of Language Outcomes for a Child with Galactosemia
Published in
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31829a7be1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M. Lewis, David J. Coman, Maryann Syrmis, Sarah Kilcoyne, Bruce E. Murdoch

Abstract

Cross-sectional methodologies have revealed age-related deterioration in cognitive performance, reflecting progressive neurodegenerative change in a minority of children and adolescents with classic galactosemia (GAL). The application of longitudinal methodologies sensitive to age-related changes at the individual level is needed to determine the extent of any possible decline in function in children with GAL. The authors report on the developmental language outcomes of a 9-year-old female with GAL through an examination of her language development over a 7-year period using a performance tracking system based on the use of raw performance scores required for attainment at the 50th percentile for age. Raw scores typically increase systematically over time and are thus more sensitive to developmental changes. Results suggest that there was no decline in the child's language skills over the course of the investigation. For the case presented, the use of raw scores offered a means of examining the child's patterns of individual change, which revealed stable language skills over the period of monitoring, perhaps indicating a stable disease process for this particular child. The authors propose this descriptive application of raw performance scores that offers a means to determine neurodevelopmental outcomes in the disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Psychology 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#1,118
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,351
of 206,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.