| Title |
Intergenerational Transmission of Emotion Dysregulation Through Parental Invalidation of Emotions: Implications for Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Child and Family Studies, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10826-013-9768-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly E. Buckholdt, Gilbert R. Parra, Lisa Jobe-Shields |
| Abstract |
We examined parent emotion dysregulation as part of a model of family emotion-related processes and adolescent psychopathology. Participants were 80 parent-adolescent dyads (mean age = 13.6; 79 % African-American and 17 % Caucasian) with diverse family composition and socioeconomic status. Parent and adolescent dyads self-reported on their emotion regulation difficulties and adolescents reported on their perceptions of parent invalidation (i.e., punishment and neglect) of emotions and their own internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Results showed that parents who reported higher levels of emotion dysregulation tended to invalidate their adolescent's emotional expressions more often, which in turn related to higher levels of adolescent emotion dysregulation. Additionally, adolescent-reported emotion dysregulation mediated the relation between parent invalidation of emotions and adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Potential applied implications are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 368 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 232 | 62% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 92 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,057,678
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#245
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,275
of 199,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.