| Title |
In-vivo short- and long-term evaluation of the interaction material-blood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-005-4731-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonietta M. Gatti, S. Montanari, A. Gambarelli, F. Capitani, R. Salvatori |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,467,510
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#284
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,069
of 147,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.