↓ Skip to main content

A prospective observational study of the clinical toxicology of glyphosate-containing herbicides in adults with acute self-poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Toxicology (15563650), February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective observational study of the clinical toxicology of glyphosate-containing herbicides in adults with acute self-poisoning
Published in
Clinical Toxicology (15563650), February 2010
DOI 10.3109/15563650903476491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren M. Roberts, Nick A. Buckley, Fahim Mohamed, Michael Eddleston, Daniel A. Goldstein, Akbar Mehrsheikh, Marian S. Bleeke, Andrew H. Dawson

Abstract

The case fatality from acute poisoning with glyphosate-containing herbicides is approximately 7.7% from the available studies but these have major limitations. Large prospective studies of patients with self-poisoning from known formulations who present to primary or secondary hospitals are needed to better describe the outcome from acute poisoning with glyphosate-containing herbicides. Furthermore, the clinical utility of the glyphosate plasma concentration for predicting clinical outcomes and guiding treatment has not been determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 162 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Other 17 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895,072
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#314
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,568
of 175,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Toxicology (15563650)
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.