↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care

Overview of attention for article published in Current Heart Failure Reports, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care
Published in
Current Heart Failure Reports, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11897-017-0318-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muaddi Alharbi, Nicola Straiton, Robyn Gallagher

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of wearable activity trackers to promote self-care management for physical activity in heart failure (HF). Exercise participation decreases hospital admissions and improves quality of life in HF, and activity tracking devices provide more precise means to assess free-living physical activity and thus enable tailored exercise instruction. Use of activity trackers by cardiac patients for self-monitoring and motivational purposes is associated with increased levels of physical activity and is predictive of disease severity. However, more research is required to establish the feasibility and validity of these devices in HF patients. It is also critical that the devices can be easily used to collect, process and utilise relevant data. Activity trackers have the potential to promote HF self-care because they provide monitoring of physical activity behaviours and the potential to generate habit formation and goal reinforcement, all of which foster physical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 30%
Computer Science 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Engineering 7 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,898,298
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Current Heart Failure Reports
#86
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,730
of 420,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Heart Failure Reports
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.