↓ Skip to main content

The Ethical Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Ethical Pain
Published in
Neuroethics, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9111-y
Authors

Michele Farisco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Librarian 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,130,559
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,984
of 94,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.