↓ Skip to main content

Hip fracture risk assessment: artificial neural network outperforms conditional logistic regression in an age- and sex-matched case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Hip fracture risk assessment: artificial neural network outperforms conditional logistic regression in an age- and sex-matched case control study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wo-Jan Tseng, Li-Wei Hung, Jiann-Shing Shieh, Maysam F Abbod, Jinn Lin

Abstract

Osteoporotic hip fractures with a significant morbidity and excess mortality among the elderly have imposed huge health and economic burdens on societies worldwide. In this age- and sex-matched case control study, we examined the risk factors of hip fractures and assessed the fracture risk by conditional logistic regression (CLR) and ensemble artificial neural network (ANN). The performances of these two classifiers were compared.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Engineering 12 14%
Unspecified 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,116
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,930
of 194,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#74
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.