↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of antimicrobial residues in pork meat in Madagascar

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of antimicrobial residues in pork meat in Madagascar
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11250-013-0445-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Rakotoharinome, Damien Pognon, Tantely Randriamparany, Jimmy Chane Ming, Jean-Patrick Idoumbin, Eric Cardinale, Vincent Porphyre

Abstract

Residual antimicrobials in food constitute a risk to human health, but poor knowledge is available about the significance of contaminated meat in developing countries. The purpose of the study was to determine the occurrence of antimicrobial drug residues in pork products in Madagascar. The occurrence of antimicrobial drug residues in pork meat were investigated by the Premi® test (DSM(©)) technique. There was a high incidence rate of drug residues, with 360 (37.2 %) meat samples being contaminated. A significant increase was observed between 2010 and 2011, with 32 and 39%, respectively. Pork meat samples are less contaminated by drug residues when animals are slaughtered in urban abattoirs (34.4%) vs in provincial abattoirs (42.2%), suggesting that animals under treatment (or sick) are sold preferentially in local abattoir. Drug residue levels in pork meats purchased in Madagascar appear to be serious public health problem at the moment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Chemistry 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,218,560
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#458
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,618
of 197,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.