↓ Skip to main content

Considering large earthquake clustering in seismic risk analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Considering large earthquake clustering in seismic risk analysis
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2549-9
Authors

Arnaud Mignan, Laurentiu Danciu, Domenico Giardini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 11%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,238
of 337,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.