↓ Skip to main content

Water-deficit-based drought risk assessments in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Water-deficit-based drought risk assessments in Taiwan
Published in
Natural Hazards, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0239-9
Authors

Jenq-Tzong Shiau, Ya-Yi Hsiao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 20%
Engineering 5 17%
Linguistics 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,472
of 167,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.