Title |
Optical satellite imagery for quantifying spatio-temporal dimension of physical exposure in disaster risk assessments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-012-0372-5 |
Authors |
Daniele Ehrlich, Patrizia Tenerelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 26% |
Computer Science | 6 | 15% |
Engineering | 5 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,937,541
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#625
of 1,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,906
of 171,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.