↓ Skip to main content

Nanomaterial risk screening: a structured approach to aid decision making under uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in Environment Systems and Decisions, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Nanomaterial risk screening: a structured approach to aid decision making under uncertainty
Published in
Environment Systems and Decisions, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10669-014-9529-y
Authors

Christian E. H. Beaudrie, Milind Kandlikar, Robin Gregory, Graham Long, Tim Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 25%
Engineering 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,516,466
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#88
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,000
of 354,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.