↓ Skip to main content

Connexin43 and the Intercellular Signaling Network Regulating Skeletal Remodeling

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Connexin43 and the Intercellular Signaling Network Regulating Skeletal Remodeling
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11914-017-0345-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan C. Moorer, Joseph P. Stains

Abstract

This review highlights recent developments into how intercellular communication through connexin43 facilitates bone modeling and remodeling. Connexin43 is required for both skeletal development and maintenance, particularly in cortical bone, where it carries out multiple functions, including preventing osteoclastogenesis, restraining osteoprogenitor proliferation, promoting osteoblast differentiation, coordinating organized collagen matrix deposition, and maintaining osteocyte survival. Emerging data shows that connexin43 regulates both the exchange of small molecules among osteoblast lineage cells and the docking of signaling proteins to the gap junction, affecting the efficiency of signal transduction. Understanding how and what connexin43 communicates to coordinate tissue remodeling has therapeutic implications in bone. Altering the information shared by intercellular communication and/or targeting the recruitment of signaling machinery to the gap junction could be used to impact the skeletal homeostatic set point, either driving osteogenesis or inhibiting resorption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,417,574
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#162
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,213
of 420,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.