↓ Skip to main content

Natural background levels and threshold values derivation for naturally As, V and F rich groundwater bodies: a methodological case study in Central Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Earth Sciences, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Natural background levels and threshold values derivation for naturally As, V and F rich groundwater bodies: a methodological case study in Central Italy
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12665-009-0404-y
Authors

Elisabetta Preziosi, Giuseppe Giuliano, Raffaella Vivona

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 29%
Environmental Science 13 27%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Earth Sciences
#158
of 1,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,572
of 164,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Earth Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them