↓ Skip to main content

A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
Title
A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0
Authors

Andreas J. Kappos, Georgios Panagopoulos, Christos Panagiotopoulos, Gregorios Penelis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 301 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 19%
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 73 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 200 63%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 4%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Design 4 1%
Psychology 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 79 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#80
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,357
of 66,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them