↓ Skip to main content

AST-induced bone loss in men with prostate cancer: exercise as a potential countermeasure

Overview of attention for article published in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AST-induced bone loss in men with prostate cancer: exercise as a potential countermeasure
Published in
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/pcan.2012.22
Pubmed ID
Authors

K A Bolam, D A Galvão, N Spry, R U Newton, D R Taaffe

Abstract

Androgen suppression treatment (AST) for men with prostate cancer is associated with a number of treatment-related side effects including an accelerated rate of bone loss. This loss of bone is greatest within the first year of AST and increases the risk for fracture. Pharmaceutical treatment in the form of bisphosphonates is currently used to counter the effects of hormone suppression on bone but is costly and associated with potential adverse effects. Recently, exercise has been shown to be an important adjuvant therapy to manage a range of treatment-related toxicities and enhance aspects of quality of life for men receiving AST. We propose that physical exercise may also have an important role in not only attenuating the bone loss associated with AST but in improving bone health and reducing fracture risk. In this review, the rationale underlying exercise as a countermeasure to AST-induced bone loss is provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Sports and Recreations 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
#1,050
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,050
of 166,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.