| Title |
Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00191-007-0060-x |
| Authors |
Franco Malerba, Richard Nelson, Luigi Orsenigo, Sidney Winter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 31% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 50 | 32% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 38 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,736,890
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#59
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,600
of 72,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them