↓ Skip to main content

Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data
Published in
Landslides, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10346-011-0299-z
Authors

M. Van Den Eeckhaut, J. Hervás, C. Jaedicke, J.-P. Malet, L. Montanarella, F. Nadim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 69 45%
Environmental Science 26 17%
Engineering 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#214
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,992
of 143,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them