↓ Skip to main content

Tier-based approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Tier-based approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment in Europe
Published in
Landslides, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10346-012-0349-1
Authors

Andreas Günther, Paola Reichenbach, Jean-Philippe Malet, Miet Van Den Eeckhaut, Javier Hervás, Claire Dashwood, Fausto Guzzetti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 42%
Environmental Science 10 11%
Engineering 10 11%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#214
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,149
of 169,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them