↓ Skip to main content

Landslide failure and runout susceptibility in the upper T. Ceno valley (Northern Apennines, Italy)

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Landslide failure and runout susceptibility in the upper T. Ceno valley (Northern Apennines, Italy)
Published in
Natural Hazards, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9349-4
Authors

A. Clerici, S. Perego, C. Tellini, P. Vescovi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 45%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Computer Science 3 10%
Engineering 3 10%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#852
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,878
of 171,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.