↓ Skip to main content

A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization
Published in
Scientometrics, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11192-011-0398-6
Authors

Carmen López-Illescas, Félix de Moya-Anegón, Henk F. Moed

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Chile 2 2%
Croatia 2 2%
Ecuador 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 89 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 14 14%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 30 29%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 42%
Computer Science 14 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,317
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,844
of 110,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.