↓ Skip to main content

Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9466-z
Authors

Dionysios A. Bournas, Paolo Negro, Fabio F. Taucer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 59 69%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#80
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,311
of 198,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.