↓ Skip to main content

International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET): creating a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing road map for regulatory purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET): creating a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing road map for regulatory purposes
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00204-015-1464-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Bal-Price, Kevin M. Crofton, Marcel Leist, Sandra Allen, Michael Arand, Timo Buetler, Nathalie Delrue, Rex E. FitzGerald, Thomas Hartung, Tuula Heinonen, Helena Hogberg, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Walter Lichtensteiger, Daniela Oggier, Martin Paparella, Marta Axelstad, Aldert Piersma, Eva Rached, Benoît Schilter, Gabriele Schmuck, Luc Stoppini, Enrico Tongiorgi, Manuela Tiramani, Florianne Monnet-Tschudi, Martin F. Wilks, Timo Ylikomi, Ellen Fritsche

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#962
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,052
of 353,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#17
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.