↓ Skip to main content

Aid distribution and the MDGs

Overview of attention for article published in World Development, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aid distribution and the MDGs
Published in
World Development, June 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.013
Authors

Bob Baulch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 82 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Professor 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 39%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from World Development
#3,481
of 5,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,559
of 86,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Development
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.