↓ Skip to main content

The Ecology of Scale: Assessment of Regional Energy Turnover and Comparison with Global Food (5 pp)

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
The Ecology of Scale: Assessment of Regional Energy Turnover and Comparison with Global Food (5 pp)
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, October 2004
DOI 10.1065/lca2004.09.180.9
Authors

Elmar Schlich, Ulla Fleissner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 18 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 24%
Engineering 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 8%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#445
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,716
of 63,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.