↓ Skip to main content

Genetics and autoantibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Genetics and autoantibodies
Published in
Immunologic Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12026-013-8396-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Perricone, Nancy Agmon-Levin, Fulvia Ceccarelli, Guido Valesini, Juan-Manuel Anaya, Yehuda Shoenfeld

Abstract

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are chronic conditions initiated by the loss of immunological tolerance to self-antigens. The pathogenic hypothesis comprises a complex interaction between genetic, environmental and hormonal factors that interact with an individual over time generating a dysregulation of the immune system leading to disease development. Several polymorphic genes contribute to the development of ADs. Furthermore, age and gender play a major role by influencing hormone levels that can represent the fulcrum unbalancing from susceptibility to protection. Evidences suggest that while all these steps occur, the susceptible individual develops autoantibodies over a long time lapse. Such autoantibody production is genetically determined and finally, their presence seems to determine the clinical presentation of ADs. The genetic predisposition to the developments of autoantibodies and toward the disease process may overlap. The unveiling of these mechanisms could allow not only to treat but also to prevent the development of autoimmune diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#557
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,691
of 199,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.