| Title |
Remediating food deserts, food swamps, and food brownfields: helping the poor access nutritious, safe, and affordable food
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AMS Review, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13162-013-0049-6 |
| Authors |
Arturo E. Osorio, Maria G. Corradini, Jerome D. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 27% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from AMS Review
#70
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,465
of 194,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMS Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them