↓ Skip to main content

Chemical, Physical and Cultural Control of Prostephanus truncatus

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Pest Management Reviews, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Chemical, Physical and Cultural Control of Prostephanus truncatus
Published in
Integrated Pest Management Reviews, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/b:ipmr.0000040817.59207.3a
Authors

P. Golob

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Benin 1 4%
Unknown 21 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Master 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Pest Management Reviews
#7
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,214
of 135,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Pest Management Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them