Title |
Capsis: an open software framework and community for forest growth modelling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13595-011-0140-9 |
Authors |
Samuel Dufour-Kowalski, Benoît Courbaud, Philippe Dreyfus, Céline Meredieu, François de Coligny |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
French Guiana | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 25% |
Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 37 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 31% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#720
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,748
of 155,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.