| Title |
A grid-based, satellite-image supported, multi-attributed vegetation mapping method (MÉTA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02806465 |
| Authors |
Zsolt Molnár, Sándor Bartha, Tibor Seregélyes, Eszter Illyés, Zoltán Botta-Dukát, Gábor Tímár, Ferenc Horváth, András Révész, András Kun, János Bölöni, Marianna Biró, László Bodonczi, Áron Deák József, Péter Fogarasi, András Horváth, István Isépy, László Karas, Ferenc Kecskés, Csaba Molnár, Adrienne Ortmann-né Ajkai, Szilvia Rév |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#38
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,871
of 69,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them