↓ Skip to main content

Application of blocking diagnosis methods to General Circulation Models. Part I: a novel detection scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Application of blocking diagnosis methods to General Circulation Models. Part I: a novel detection scheme
Published in
Climate Dynamics, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0767-5
Authors

D. Barriopedro, R. García-Herrera, R. M. Trigo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 54 50%
Environmental Science 13 12%
Physics and Astronomy 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,028
of 4,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,719
of 94,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.