Title |
Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11051-010-9893-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Prashant Kumar, Paul Fennell, Alan Robins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 31% |
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 25% |
Engineering | 6 | 12% |
Materials Science | 4 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 25% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,058
of 106,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.