| Title |
A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-008-9435-7 |
| Authors |
Christopher M. Hoo, Natasha Starostin, Paul West, Martha L. Mecartney |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 842 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 827 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 152 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 113 | 13% |
| Researcher | 73 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 8% |
| Unknown | 230 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 163 | 19% |
| Engineering | 76 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 54 | 6% |
| Other | 170 | 20% |
| Unknown | 259 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,699
of 82,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.