| Title |
Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuan Liu, Pengzhu Zhang, Xin Li, Hsinchun Chen, Yan Dang, Catherine Larson, Mihail C. Roco, Xianwen Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 30% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 39% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,339
of 110,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.