↓ Skip to main content

The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11367-013-0609-x
Authors

Nathan Pelletier, Karen Allacker, Rana Pant, Simone Manfredi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Researcher 26 15%
Professor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 39 23%
Engineering 30 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#445
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,028
of 178,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.