↓ Skip to main content

Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10071-008-0175-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Horowitz

Abstract

The social cognitive capacities of dogs, including their communication skills and use of visual attention cues, have recently been investigated in numerous experimental studies. This paper reports on research of domestic dog behavior in a natural setting, which shows sensitivity to the visual attention of their partners when engaged in dyadic rough-and-tumble play. The sequential behaviors and head-direction of both dogs were noted throughout the bouts. The behaviors were differentially used according to the partner's posture. Play signals were sent nearly exclusively to forward-facing conspecifics; attention-getting behaviors were used most often when a playmate was facing away, and before signaling an interest to play. In addition, the mode of attention-getter matched the degree of inattentiveness of the playmate: stronger attention-getters were used when a playmate was looking away or distracted, less forceful ones when the partner was facing forward or laterally. In other words, these dogs showed attention to, and acted to manipulate, a feature of other dogs that mediates their ability to respond: which feature in human interaction is called "attention".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Austria 3 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 353 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 135 37%
Student > Master 47 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Researcher 35 9%
Other 20 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 38 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 25%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Arts and Humanities 27 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 6%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 48 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#345,654
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#98
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#621
of 83,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them