↓ Skip to main content

Autoimmune Encephalitis: Pathophysiology and Imaging Review of an Overlooked Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 5,302)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
70 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
517 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autoimmune Encephalitis: Pathophysiology and Imaging Review of an Overlooked Diagnosis
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2017
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a5086
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.P. Kelley, S.C. Patel, H.L. Marin, J.J. Corrigan, P.D. Mitsias, B. Griffith

Abstract

Autoimmune encephalitis is a relatively new category of immune-mediated disease involving the central nervous system that demonstrates a widely variable spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from the relatively mild or insidious onset of cognitive impairment to more complex forms of encephalopathy with refractory seizure. Due to its diverse clinical features, which can mimic a variety of other pathologic processes, autoimmune encephalitis presents a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. Imaging findings in patients with these disorders can also be quite variable, but recognizing characteristic findings within limbic structures suggestive of autoimmune encephalitis can be a key step in alerting clinicians to the potential diagnosis and ensuring a prompt and appropriate clinical work-up. In this article, we review antibody-mediated encephalitis and its various subtypes with a specific emphasis on the role of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 516 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 68 13%
Student > Postgraduate 64 12%
Researcher 61 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Student > Master 42 8%
Other 115 22%
Unknown 123 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 247 48%
Neuroscience 63 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Psychology 7 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 146 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#552,958
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#35
of 5,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,083
of 426,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.