↓ Skip to main content

CPR PRO® Device Reduces Rescuer Fatigue during Continuous Chest Compression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using a Manikin Model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Emergency Medicine, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CPR PRO® Device Reduces Rescuer Fatigue during Continuous Chest Compression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using a Manikin Model
Published in
Journal of Emergency Medicine, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivor Kovic, Dinka Lulic, Ileana Lulic

Abstract

The performance of high-quality chest compressions with minimal interruptions is one of the most important elements of the "Chain of Survival."

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Engineering 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#1,329
of 3,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,947
of 206,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#18
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.