↓ Skip to main content

On the Origin of Near Eastern Founder Crops and the ‘Dump-heap Hypothesis’

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
On the Origin of Near Eastern Founder Crops and the ‘Dump-heap Hypothesis’
Published in
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10722-004-7069-x
Authors

Shahal Abbo, Avi Gopher, Baruch Rubin, Simcha Lev-Yadun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 66 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 13 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 49%
Arts and Humanities 13 18%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#273
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,243
of 57,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.