↓ Skip to main content

A quantitative analytical method for PIVKA-II using multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A quantitative analytical method for PIVKA-II using multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0227-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Areum Sohn, Hyunsoo Kim, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Youngsoo Kim

Abstract

Prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II) is an effective tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We have developed a novel targeted mass spectrometric (MS) assay for quantifying PIVKA-II in human serum. The ideal signature peptide was selected to measure PIVKA-II concentrations on a triple quadrupole (QqQ) mass spectrometer, and the chromatography gradient was optimized for the peptide separation to minimize elution interference. Using multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (MRM-MS), good linearity (R (2) = 0.9988) was obtained for PIVKA-II over a range of 3 orders. We achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.45 nM (31.72 ng/mL), a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.93 nM (65.31 ng/mL), a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.49 nM (34.32 ng/mL), and an upper limit of quantification (ULOQ) of 1000.00 nM (70,037.00 ng/mL). The intra-day and inter-day precisions were within ±14.96%, and the accuracy ranged from 87.66 to 114.29% for QC samples at four concentrations. Compared with an established immunoassay, the correlation (R = 0.8335) was good for the measurements of PIVKA-II concentrations. This method was successfully applied to the analysis of clinical samples for normal control (n = 50), chronic hepatitis (n = 50), liver cirrhosis (n = 50), HCC (n = 50), and recovery (n = 50) serum. Graphical Abstract MRM-MS assay development for determining concentration of PIVKA-II in serum and a comparison between MRM-MS assay and immunoassay with high correlation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,216,385
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,169
of 9,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,018
of 426,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#57
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.