| Title |
A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The STarT Back Trial Study Protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-9-58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine M Hay, Kate M Dunn, Jonathan C Hill, Martyn Lewis, Elizabeth E Mason, Kika Konstantinou, Gail Sowden, Simon Somerville, Kanchan Vohora, David Whitehurst, Chris J Main |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 319 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 74 | 22% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 18% |
| Psychology | 19 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 66 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,386
of 4,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,870
of 96,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.