↓ Skip to main content

The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02979083
Authors

Olivier Jolliet, Ruedi Müller-Wenk, Jane Bare, Alan Brent, Mark Goedkoop, Reinout Heijungs, Norihiro Itsubo, Claudia Peña, David Pennington, José Potting, Gerald Rebitzer, Mary Stewart, Helias Udo de Haes, Bo Weidema

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 7 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 306 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 25%
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 67 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 94 29%
Engineering 69 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Chemistry 8 2%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 89 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2012.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#273
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,780
of 64,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.