| Title |
Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, November 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02978665 |
| Authors |
Jane C. Bare, Patrick Hofstetter, David W. Pennington, Helias A. Udo de Haes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Réunion | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 510 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 123 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 22% |
| Researcher | 84 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 90 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 150 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 140 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 4% |
| Energy | 14 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 63 | 12% |
| Unknown | 132 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#551
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,443
of 42,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.