↓ Skip to main content

Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Effects of hyperthermia on the metabolic responses to repeated high-intensity exercise
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00421-004-1191-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. M. Linnane, R. M. Bracken, S. Brooks, V. M. Cox, D. Ball

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the metabolic and performance responses to hyperthermia during high-intensity exercise. Seven males completed two 30-s cycle sprints (SpI and SpII) at an environmental temperature of 20.6 (0.3) degrees C [mean (SD)] with 4 min recovery between sprints. A hot or control treatment preceded the sprint exercise. For the hot trial, subjects were immersed up to the neck in hot water [43 degrees C for 16.0 (3.2) min] prior to entering an environmental chamber [44.2 (0.8) degrees C for 30.7 (7.1) min]. For the control trial, subjects were seated in an empty bath (15 min) and thereafter in a normal environment [20.2 (0.6) degrees C for 29.0 (1.9) min]. Subjects' core temperature prior to exercise was 38.1 (0.3) degrees C in the hot trial and 37.1 (0.3) degrees C in the control trial. Mean power output (MPO) was significantly higher in the hot condition for SpI [683 (130) W hot vs 646 (119) W control ( P<0.025)]. Peak power output (PPO) tended to be higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial for SpI [1057 (260) W hot vs 990 (245) W control ( P=0.03, NS)]. These differences in power output were a consequence of a faster pedal cadence in the hot trial ( P<0.025). There were no differences in sprint performance in SpII in the hot trial compared to the control trial; however, MPO was significantly reduced from SpI to SpII in the hot condition but not in the control condition ( P<0.025). Plasma ammonia was higher in the hot trial at 2 min post-SpI [169 (65) micromol l(-1 )hot vs 70 (26) micromol l(-1) control ( P<0.01)], immediately and at 2 min post-SpII [231 (76) micromol l(-1) hot vs 147 (72) micromol l(-1) control ( P<0.01)]. Blood lactate was higher in the hot trial compared with the control trial at 5 min post-SpII ( P<0.025). The results of this study suggest that an elevation in core body temperature by 1 degrees C can improve performance during an initial bout of high-intensity cycle exercise but has no further beneficial effect on subsequent power production following a 4-min recovery period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 71 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,198
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,551
of 59,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.