| Title |
Plant biotechnology for food security and bioeconomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11103-013-0097-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jihong Liu Clarke, Peng Zhang |
| Abstract |
This year is a special year for plant biotechnology. It was 30 years ago, on January 18 1983, one of the most important dates in the history of plant biotechnology, that three independent groups described Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation at the Miami Winter Symposium, leading to the production of normal, fertile transgenic plants (Bevan et al. in Nature 304:184-187, 1983; Fraley et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4803-4807, 1983; Herrera-Estrella et al. in EMBO J 2:987-995, 1983; Vasil in Plant Cell Rep 27:1432-1440, 2008). Since then, plant biotechnology has rapidly advanced into a useful and valuable tool and has made a significant impact on crop production, development of a biotech industry and the bio-based economy worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Argentina | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,039,026
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#2,175
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,783
of 172,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.