↓ Skip to main content

Physiological ramifications of habitat selection in territorial male ovenbirds: consequences of landscape fragmentation

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Physiological ramifications of habitat selection in territorial male ovenbirds: consequences of landscape fragmentation
Published in
Oecologia, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-001-0818-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel F. Mazerolle, Keith A. Hobson

Abstract

Since boreal forest fragments are of lower quality than contiguous forest for breeding Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapillus), we predicted that competition for breeding sites in contiguous forest should lead to a greater prevalence of individuals in better condition in these habitats. We quantified male condition using morphological and hematological indices. Males in contiguous forest were larger than males in forest fragments and had higher hematocrits and mean corpuscular volumes, as well as a greater prevalence of polychromatic cells. These hematological indices are all positively associated with energy demands or stress, or both. Furthermore, the proportion of heterophils, a type of white blood cell positively associated with stress, decreased through the breeding season only for males in forest fragments. Total plasma protein and mass corrected for structural size did not differ between landscapes, suggesting that the nutritional status of males was similar between landscapes. All of these trends were independent of age. Overall, these results indicate that size of male Ovenbirds could be playing a role in habitat selection, but that defending territories in contiguous forest, where breeding success is higher and populations are denser, seems to result in greater energetic demands and a reduced immunological condition. These results demonstrate a physiological component to contrasting consequences associated with territory acquisition in birds.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 128 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 11 8%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 56%
Environmental Science 19 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,680
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,159
of 124,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.