↓ Skip to main content

Improved watermelon quality using bottle gourd rootstock expressing a Ca2+/H+ antiporter

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Breeding, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Improved watermelon quality using bottle gourd rootstock expressing a Ca2+/H+ antiporter
Published in
Molecular Breeding, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11032-009-9284-9
Authors

Jeung-Sul Han, Sunghun Park, Toshiro Shigaki, Kendal D. Hirschi, Chang Kil Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Breeding
#155
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,811
of 93,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Breeding
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.