↓ Skip to main content

Female perception of a partner’s mate value discrepancy and controlling behaviour in romantic relationships

Overview of attention for article published in acta ethologica, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Female perception of a partner’s mate value discrepancy and controlling behaviour in romantic relationships
Published in
acta ethologica, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10211-016-0240-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dariusz P. Danel, Agnieszka Siennicka, Kinga Glińska, Piotr Fedurek, Natalia Nowak-Szczepańska, Ewa A. Jankowska, Bogusław Pawłowski, Zdzisław Lewandowski

Abstract

Mate value discrepancy (MVD) between heterosexual partners is an important factor influencing relationship satisfaction which, in turn, has an effect on the quality and the stability of the relationship. Therefore, partners' involvement in mate retention behaviours, such as controlling behaviours, can be related to MVD and our study aims to determine whether such an association exists. In order to do so, we analysed female perception of MVD and their opinion regarding the intensity of controlling behaviours performed by themselves as well as their romantic partners. Female perception of the intensity of controlling behaviours performed by both partners was the highest in couples where a woman assesses her own mate value (MV) as higher than her partner's MV and significantly different than in relationships where male MV exceeded those of the female. Our study also indicates that MVD should be taken into account when analysing sex differences in intensities of mate retention behaviours. Finally, we provide evidence supporting the significance of the relationship length for controlling behaviour intensity. Findings are discussed within an evolutionary perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 26%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 35%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,972,588
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from acta ethologica
#56
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,589
of 327,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from acta ethologica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.